1. Allegedly, but I've still to iron out a few teething problems (if such a term can still apply to something several years on) so it's a provisional "Yes" going on "No".
2. Multi-Editor Review Processing- basically your review gets approved or declined according to the "best out of three" voting mechanism.
There is also SERPing, which was introduced to try and speed things along by allowing a single editor to approve or decline a review when they feel it's undoubtedly one way or the other.
3. They can view it, but no-one unregistered can post.
2. Multi-Editor Review Processing- basically your review gets approved or declined according to the "best out of three" voting mechanism.
There is also SERPing, which was introduced to try and speed things along by allowing a single editor to approve or decline a review when they feel it's undoubtedly one way or the other.
When did the SERPing bit happen? That explains why some newly written reviews sometimes get declined or approved and older ones are still pending.
2. Multi-Editor Review Processing- basically your review gets approved or declined according to the "best out of three" voting mechanism.
There is also SERPing, which was introduced to try and speed things along by allowing a single editor to approve or decline a review when they feel it's undoubtedly one way or the other.
When did the SERPing bit happen? That explains why some newly written reviews sometimes get declined or approved and older ones are still pending.
Um... not sure exactly. Some time mid-way through last year? It might account for some old reviews pending, but as long as there's three active MERPs (and I'm pretty sure there are), no review will be left in limbo for that long.
More likely it's one that a MERP wasn't sure about and passed on to me to decide. I'm just one big bottleneck I'm afraid